https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345414 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Order-in-Original and allowing the appeal. It held that the recovery of Cenvat credit under Rule 14 required a clear establishment of wrongly taken credit, which was lacking in this case. The decision emphasized the necessity of proving the inadmissibility of Cenvat credit before invoking recovery provisions. The appellant was granted consequential relief as per the law, highlighting the importance of adherence to legal principles and precedents in such matters. en-us Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:46:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345414 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Order-in-Original and allowing the appeal. It held that the recovery of Cenvat credit under Rule 14 required a clear establishment of wrongly taken credit, which was lacking in this case. The decision emphasized the necessity of proving the inadmissibility of Cenvat credit before invoking recovery provisions. The appellant was granted consequential relief as per the law, highlighting the importance of adherence to legal principles and precedents in such matters. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345414