https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193199 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the respondent's entitlement to possession of the village and rejecting the appellants' claims based on a bilmakta sanad and adverse possession. The judgment upheld the respondent's rights and clarified the nature of jagirdari tenure and the application of limitation laws in such cases. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:28:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193199 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the respondent's entitlement to possession of the village and rejecting the appellants' claims based on a bilmakta sanad and adverse possession. The judgment upheld the respondent's rights and clarified the nature of jagirdari tenure and the application of limitation laws in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193199