<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1078 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193196</link>
    <description>The appeals in the case were allowed, and all additions made by the Assessing Officer were directed to be deleted for the appellants. The Tribunal found that the adoption of unaccounted sales, estimation of gross profit, additions for unaccounted purchases, addition towards payment on retirement from the partnership firm, addition in respect of purchases of chemicals, and addition of gifts as unexplained income were not sustainable due to lack of evidence or justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 18:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1078 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193196</link>
      <description>The appeals in the case were allowed, and all additions made by the Assessing Officer were directed to be deleted for the appellants. The Tribunal found that the adoption of unaccounted sales, estimation of gross profit, additions for unaccounted purchases, addition towards payment on retirement from the partnership firm, addition in respect of purchases of chemicals, and addition of gifts as unexplained income were not sustainable due to lack of evidence or justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>