<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345384</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the surrendered amount should be considered part of the income from business for computing book profits. The Court emphasized the importance of consistent treatment of income across different sections of the Income Tax Act, ultimately allowing the appeal and clarifying the interpretation of Section 40(b) in the context of surrendered amounts during a survey.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345384</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the surrendered amount should be considered part of the income from business for computing book profits. The Court emphasized the importance of consistent treatment of income across different sections of the Income Tax Act, ultimately allowing the appeal and clarifying the interpretation of Section 40(b) in the context of surrendered amounts during a survey.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>