<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 494 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345382</link>
    <description>The Court determined that the transportation of coal by a goods transport agency from pit-heads to railway sidings should be classified under &quot;transport of goods by road service&quot; (Section 65(105)(zzp)) rather than as services related to &quot;mining of mineral, oil, or gas&quot; (Section 65(105)(zzzy)) under the Service Tax Act of 1994. The Court rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding temporal distinctions post-June 1, 2007, and emphasized that the activity did not align with the definition of &#039;mines&#039; under the Mines Act, 1952. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the classification under Section 65(105)(zzp).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 494 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345382</link>
      <description>The Court determined that the transportation of coal by a goods transport agency from pit-heads to railway sidings should be classified under &quot;transport of goods by road service&quot; (Section 65(105)(zzp)) rather than as services related to &quot;mining of mineral, oil, or gas&quot; (Section 65(105)(zzzy)) under the Service Tax Act of 1994. The Court rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding temporal distinctions post-June 1, 2007, and emphasized that the activity did not align with the definition of &#039;mines&#039; under the Mines Act, 1952. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the classification under Section 65(105)(zzp).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>