<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 493 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s failure to pay service tax without demonstrating a genuine reasonable cause. However, it set aside the confirmation of demand for an earlier period not included in the initial show cause notice and overturned the denial of Cenvat credit on car hire and air travel charges. The appeal was allowed in part, with the penalty upheld and the demands for the earlier period and Cenvat credit being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 493 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s failure to pay service tax without demonstrating a genuine reasonable cause. However, it set aside the confirmation of demand for an earlier period not included in the initial show cause notice and overturned the denial of Cenvat credit on car hire and air travel charges. The appeal was allowed in part, with the penalty upheld and the demands for the earlier period and Cenvat credit being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>