https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345367 The Tribunal allowed the appellant to avail cenvat credit of Rs. 6,00,613/- on rejected/spoiled inputs received back and Rs. 67,16,069/- on inputs in waste/scrap generated at the job worker's end. The Tribunal referred the first issue to the Hon'ble President for a third member's nomination due to conflicting opinions. A separate judgment upheld a portion of the demand, citing lack of evidence for duty payment on scrap and delayed responses by the appellant. The matter was also referred to resolve differences on reversing cenvat credit for rejected inputs. en-us Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:31:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345367 The Tribunal allowed the appellant to avail cenvat credit of Rs. 6,00,613/- on rejected/spoiled inputs received back and Rs. 67,16,069/- on inputs in waste/scrap generated at the job worker's end. The Tribunal referred the first issue to the Hon'ble President for a third member's nomination due to conflicting opinions. A separate judgment upheld a portion of the demand, citing lack of evidence for duty payment on scrap and delayed responses by the appellant. The matter was also referred to resolve differences on reversing cenvat credit for rejected inputs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345367