https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345359 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the valuation of export goods, specifically Iron Ore Fines, and the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the respondent, M/s Agarwal Associates, stating that the transportation cost was already factored into the price charged by the supplier, M/s Gallant Ispat Ltd. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's decision, granting consequential relief to the respondent. en-us Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:30:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345359 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the valuation of export goods, specifically Iron Ore Fines, and the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the respondent, M/s Agarwal Associates, stating that the transportation cost was already factored into the price charged by the supplier, M/s Gallant Ispat Ltd. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's decision, granting consequential relief to the respondent. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345359