<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 470 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345358</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to reappear before the respondent, produce the account books, and receive copies of the documents as directed by the Tribunal. The respondent was instructed to allow perusal of documents for which copies could not be provided and grant a specific timeframe for the petitioner to submit objections. Following the objections, the respondent was mandated to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner and conduct the assessment afresh in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 470 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345358</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to reappear before the respondent, produce the account books, and receive copies of the documents as directed by the Tribunal. The respondent was instructed to allow perusal of documents for which copies could not be provided and grant a specific timeframe for the petitioner to submit objections. Following the objections, the respondent was mandated to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner and conduct the assessment afresh in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>