<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1305 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193182</link>
    <description>The departmental appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the decisions on CLU and EDC charges, Stamp Duty, and Registration Charges, while allowing the deduction for forfeited advances but confirming the disallowance of Miscellaneous Expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1305 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193182</link>
      <description>The departmental appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the decisions on CLU and EDC charges, Stamp Duty, and Registration Charges, while allowing the deduction for forfeited advances but confirming the disallowance of Miscellaneous Expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>