https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193185 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order denying Cenvat credit on cement used for treating toxic effluent jarosite before disposal. The Tribunal held that the appellant's use of cement for treating hazardous waste as toxic effluent at a secured land fill was integral to their manufacturing activity, following a previous precedent allowing Cenvat credit for similar activities. The decision emphasized that the cement usage for effluent treatment was part of the manufacturing process, justifying the entitlement to Cenvat credit. Therefore, the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee, granting consequential relief. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:28:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193185 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order denying Cenvat credit on cement used for treating toxic effluent jarosite before disposal. The Tribunal held that the appellant's use of cement for treating hazardous waste as toxic effluent at a secured land fill was integral to their manufacturing activity, following a previous precedent allowing Cenvat credit for similar activities. The decision emphasized that the cement usage for effluent treatment was part of the manufacturing process, justifying the entitlement to Cenvat credit. Therefore, the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee, granting consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193185