<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1373 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding compliance with Sec. 54F conditions and eligibility for exemption. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and directed the Assessing Officer to grant exemption on the remaining construction cost invested before the due date u/s.139(4) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1373 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding compliance with Sec. 54F conditions and eligibility for exemption. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and directed the Assessing Officer to grant exemption on the remaining construction cost invested before the due date u/s.139(4) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>