https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193137 The court held that the City Civil Court in Bombay had jurisdiction to hear the suit for loan recovery, overturning the trial judge's decision. Emphasizing the common law rule in the absence of specific contractual provisions, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting a decree for the loan amount with interest. The decree was enforced against specific defendants and their interests in joint property, along with costs and additional interest. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:59:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193137 The court held that the City Civil Court in Bombay had jurisdiction to hear the suit for loan recovery, overturning the trial judge's decision. Emphasizing the common law rule in the absence of specific contractual provisions, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting a decree for the loan amount with interest. The decree was enforced against specific defendants and their interests in joint property, along with costs and additional interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193137