https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193136 Territorial jurisdiction for a contract claim may arise at the creditor's residence where the contract fixes no place of payment. Under the rule that a debtor must seek out and pay a creditor residing within the realm, the creditor's residence constitutes an implied place of performance. Section 20(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure permits suit institution where the contract is to be performed or money is expressly or impliedly payable. The contrary view that the Contract Act prevents this inference does not govern where no payment location can be inferred from the agreement. en-us Fri, 06 Dec 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:27:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193136 Territorial jurisdiction for a contract claim may arise at the creditor's residence where the contract fixes no place of payment. Under the rule that a debtor must seek out and pay a creditor residing within the realm, the creditor's residence constitutes an implied place of performance. Section 20(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure permits suit institution where the contract is to be performed or money is expressly or impliedly payable. The contrary view that the Contract Act prevents this inference does not govern where no payment location can be inferred from the agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Dec 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193136