https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193125 Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act applied where an accused in police custody gave information leading to discovery of a fact, even though the custody related to another offence; the discovery evidence was therefore admissible and the evidentiary objection failed. The court also held that there was no sufficient basis to interfere with the sentence or to grant relief under the youthful offender provision, as the Magistrate had already considered that discretion and no compelling reason for appellate intervention was shown. The conviction was sustained and the petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 1942 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:26:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193125 Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act applied where an accused in police custody gave information leading to discovery of a fact, even though the custody related to another offence; the discovery evidence was therefore admissible and the evidentiary objection failed. The court also held that there was no sufficient basis to interfere with the sentence or to grant relief under the youthful offender provision, as the Magistrate had already considered that discretion and no compelling reason for appellate intervention was shown. The conviction was sustained and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Aug 1942 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193125