<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (8) TMI 11 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9086</link>
    <description>The court upheld the estimation of profits by the Tribunal for building contracts and road works due to the lack of maintained accounts by the assessee. It found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s actions, emphasizing the higher profit margins in road works contracts. Regarding alleged sub-contracts and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty imposition was unjustified as there was no evidence of deliberate concealment. The importance of genuine sub-contracts and proper record-keeping was highlighted to avoid disputes in profit assessment and penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (8) TMI 11 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9086</link>
      <description>The court upheld the estimation of profits by the Tribunal for building contracts and road works due to the lack of maintained accounts by the assessee. It found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s actions, emphasizing the higher profit margins in road works contracts. Regarding alleged sub-contracts and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty imposition was unjustified as there was no evidence of deliberate concealment. The importance of genuine sub-contracts and proper record-keeping was highlighted to avoid disputes in profit assessment and penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>