<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (4) TMI 69 - High Court Of Andhra Pradesh</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193122</link>
    <description>Material inconsistencies between the principal witness&#039;s account and earlier versions, together with non-supply of prior inquest statements to the defence, undermined the reliability of the prosecution evidence because the accused was denied an effective chance to confront contradictions. The commentary also notes that a Magistrate-recorded statement cannot be treated as a confession unless the mandatory safeguards for recording confessions are followed, including warning and satisfaction as to voluntariness. It further states that a statement describing an attempted suicide is not a dying declaration where the maker survives, and cannot be used as substantive evidence against the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (4) TMI 69 - High Court Of Andhra Pradesh</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193122</link>
      <description>Material inconsistencies between the principal witness&#039;s account and earlier versions, together with non-supply of prior inquest statements to the defence, undermined the reliability of the prosecution evidence because the accused was denied an effective chance to confront contradictions. The commentary also notes that a Magistrate-recorded statement cannot be treated as a confession unless the mandatory safeguards for recording confessions are followed, including warning and satisfaction as to voluntariness. It further states that a statement describing an attempted suicide is not a dying declaration where the maker survives, and cannot be used as substantive evidence against the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>