https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193121 The High Court of Bombay held that confessions were not involuntary merely because the accused had been under surveillance or subject to restriction before formal arrest, where there was no material showing inducement, threat, promise, or breach of the requirement of production before a Magistrate without unnecessary delay. It also found the confessions were not inherently false or unreliable, as the alleged inconsistencies were minor and the surrounding evidence supported their substance. The retracted extra-judicial confessions were sufficiently corroborated by the accused's conduct, the presence and recovery of gold from the vehicle, and other attendant circumstances, establishing conscious possession beyond reasonable doubt. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:17:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193121 The High Court of Bombay held that confessions were not involuntary merely because the accused had been under surveillance or subject to restriction before formal arrest, where there was no material showing inducement, threat, promise, or breach of the requirement of production before a Magistrate without unnecessary delay. It also found the confessions were not inherently false or unreliable, as the alleged inconsistencies were minor and the surrounding evidence supported their substance. The retracted extra-judicial confessions were sufficiently corroborated by the accused's conduct, the presence and recovery of gold from the vehicle, and other attendant circumstances, establishing conscious possession beyond reasonable doubt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193121