<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 461 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345349</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the Order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, which directed the confiscation of imported Aluminium Scrap and cash. The Court found the impugned Order to be legally valid, addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns adequately. The Court noted that the conditions imposed, including redemption fines and penalties, were appropriate, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 461 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345349</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the Order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, which directed the confiscation of imported Aluminium Scrap and cash. The Court found the impugned Order to be legally valid, addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns adequately. The Court noted that the conditions imposed, including redemption fines and penalties, were appropriate, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>