<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 434 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous petitions filed by the assessee seeking a recall of the order dated 07.04.2016 due to nonprosecution of appeals, citing them as beyond the limitation period under section 254(2) of the Act. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory limitations, highlighting the absence of provisions for condonation of delay and aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 434 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous petitions filed by the assessee seeking a recall of the order dated 07.04.2016 due to nonprosecution of appeals, citing them as beyond the limitation period under section 254(2) of the Act. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory limitations, highlighting the absence of provisions for condonation of delay and aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>