<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (7) TMI 32 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9080</link>
    <description>A High Court may decline to answer a reference under section 26(2) of the Gift Tax Act when the assessee withdraws the reference or shows no interest in pursuing it. Applying established precedent, the court held that it was not bound to proceed where the party at whose instance the reference was made no longer wished to press it, and distinguished authority where a reference was answered because the issue had already been finally determined by the Supreme Court. Exercising its discretion, the court acceded to the assessee&#039;s request, declined to answer the reference, and directed payment of the reference costs to the department together with an advocate&#039;s fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (7) TMI 32 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9080</link>
      <description>A High Court may decline to answer a reference under section 26(2) of the Gift Tax Act when the assessee withdraws the reference or shows no interest in pursuing it. Applying established precedent, the court held that it was not bound to proceed where the party at whose instance the reference was made no longer wished to press it, and distinguished authority where a reference was answered because the issue had already been finally determined by the Supreme Court. Exercising its discretion, the court acceded to the assessee&#039;s request, declined to answer the reference, and directed payment of the reference costs to the department together with an advocate&#039;s fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>