<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1218 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the AO&#039;s findings that disallowed the short-term capital loss claimed by the appellants. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were premeditated and designed to evade tax, lacking genuine commercial intent. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed, and the findings of the AO were reinstated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1218 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the AO&#039;s findings that disallowed the short-term capital loss claimed by the appellants. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were premeditated and designed to evade tax, lacking genuine commercial intent. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed, and the findings of the AO were reinstated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>