<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 294 - High Court Of Bombay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193108</link>
    <description>A non-statutory industrial incentive scheme does not create an enforceable right to an eligibility certificate where the scheme expressly states that no right to incentive arises merely on fulfilment of conditions and leaves eligibility determination to the implementing authority. Promissory estoppel cannot override that negative wording. Refusal of benefits under such a scheme does not, by itself, infringe Article 19(1)(g), and an Article 14 challenge fails without a legally cognisable showing of discriminatory treatment. On that reasoning, no mandamus or declaratory relief can be granted on the claimed entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 294 - High Court Of Bombay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193108</link>
      <description>A non-statutory industrial incentive scheme does not create an enforceable right to an eligibility certificate where the scheme expressly states that no right to incentive arises merely on fulfilment of conditions and leaves eligibility determination to the implementing authority. Promissory estoppel cannot override that negative wording. Refusal of benefits under such a scheme does not, by itself, infringe Article 19(1)(g), and an Article 14 challenge fails without a legally cognisable showing of discriminatory treatment. On that reasoning, no mandamus or declaratory relief can be granted on the claimed entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>