<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 426 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345314</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the treatment of expenditure towards technical know-how, allowing it as revenue expenditure. The ITAT also partially sided with the Assessee on the disallowance under section 14A r.w.Rule 8(2)(ii), remitting the issue back to the AO for fresh consideration. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal interpretations and precedents supporting the Assessee&#039;s position on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 426 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345314</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the treatment of expenditure towards technical know-how, allowing it as revenue expenditure. The ITAT also partially sided with the Assessee on the disallowance under section 14A r.w.Rule 8(2)(ii), remitting the issue back to the AO for fresh consideration. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal interpretations and precedents supporting the Assessee&#039;s position on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>