<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the addition to the extent of 5% of the bogus purchase amount under section 69C of the IT Act. This decision aimed to address revenue leakage based on the decline in gross profit shown by the assessee and the failure to produce sufficient evidence regarding the disputed purchases. The Tribunal balanced the interests of both parties by limiting the addition while considering the overall circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the addition to the extent of 5% of the bogus purchase amount under section 69C of the IT Act. This decision aimed to address revenue leakage based on the decline in gross profit shown by the assessee and the failure to produce sufficient evidence regarding the disputed purchases. The Tribunal balanced the interests of both parties by limiting the addition while considering the overall circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>