<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (1) TMI 2 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9064</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the sealing of the lockers and restraint orders did not constitute seizure. Therefore, the petitioner was not entitled to the release of assets based on the ninety-day limitation. The court directed authorities to decide on the seizure of locker contents within two weeks and proceed accordingly, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (1) TMI 2 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9064</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the sealing of the lockers and restraint orders did not constitute seizure. Therefore, the petitioner was not entitled to the release of assets based on the ninety-day limitation. The court directed authorities to decide on the seizure of locker contents within two weeks and proceed accordingly, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>