<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 418 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345306</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the assessment order was quashed due to the non-issuance of the mandatory notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned based on credible evidence presented by the Chartered Accountant&#039;s office. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of issuing a notice under Section 143(2) for reassessment proceedings, invalidating the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in the absence of such notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 418 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345306</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the assessment order was quashed due to the non-issuance of the mandatory notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned based on credible evidence presented by the Chartered Accountant&#039;s office. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of issuing a notice under Section 143(2) for reassessment proceedings, invalidating the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in the absence of such notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>