<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 417 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, emphasizing compliance with section 50C(2) provisions. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were directed to provide the assessee with opportunities to establish the correct market value, present evidence for claimed expenses, and ensure proper assessment procedures were followed. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 417 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, emphasizing compliance with section 50C(2) provisions. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were directed to provide the assessee with opportunities to establish the correct market value, present evidence for claimed expenses, and ensure proper assessment procedures were followed. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>