https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345303 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the first respondent, related to service tax demand. The Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, emphasizing the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before approaching the High Court. The petitioner's compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was recognized, and the Court intervened to rectify the erroneous conclusion by the first respondent. Ultimately, the High Court directed the appellate authority to register the appeal, hear the petitioner, and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345303 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the first respondent, related to service tax demand. The Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, emphasizing the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before approaching the High Court. The petitioner's compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was recognized, and the Court intervened to rectify the erroneous conclusion by the first respondent. Ultimately, the High Court directed the appellate authority to register the appeal, hear the petitioner, and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345303