<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 411 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345299</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized that the errors in the invoices were rectifiable and should not result in the denial of credit. Precedents and statutory provisions supported the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the eligibility of the credit despite discrepancies in the invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 411 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345299</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized that the errors in the invoices were rectifiable and should not result in the denial of credit. Precedents and statutory provisions supported the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the eligibility of the credit despite discrepancies in the invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>