https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345293 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, upholding the Commissioner's decision. The appellant's fraudulent practices in availing Cenvat credit based on fake invoices, failure to verify dealer information, and inability to provide evidence for genuine transactions led to the rejection of their appeal. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not discharge statutory burdens and relied on questionable orders, resulting in the dismissal of their case. en-us Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345293 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, upholding the Commissioner's decision. The appellant's fraudulent practices in availing Cenvat credit based on fake invoices, failure to verify dealer information, and inability to provide evidence for genuine transactions led to the rejection of their appeal. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not discharge statutory burdens and relied on questionable orders, resulting in the dismissal of their case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345293