https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345276 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no evidence of intentional duty evasion or wilful misstatement. The penalties imposed under Section 11AC were overturned due to the lack of proof supporting intentional duty evasion. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence in cases involving duty discrepancies and intentional evasion, ultimately allowing the appeal and rejecting the imposition of penalties on the appellant. en-us Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:25:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345276 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no evidence of intentional duty evasion or wilful misstatement. The penalties imposed under Section 11AC were overturned due to the lack of proof supporting intentional duty evasion. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence in cases involving duty discrepancies and intentional evasion, ultimately allowing the appeal and rejecting the imposition of penalties on the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345276