<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 384 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat credit for steel items used in constructing steel structures for plant and machinery installation. The Member (Judicial) determined that the goods were included in the input definition before the 2009 amendment, distinguishing a previous case cited by the Revenue. The appellant&#039;s reliance on legal precedents, including Supreme Court and High Court judgments, supported their entitlement to the credit. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:25:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 384 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat credit for steel items used in constructing steel structures for plant and machinery installation. The Member (Judicial) determined that the goods were included in the input definition before the 2009 amendment, distinguishing a previous case cited by the Revenue. The appellant&#039;s reliance on legal precedents, including Supreme Court and High Court judgments, supported their entitlement to the credit. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>