https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345271 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the appellant's manufacturing and construction activities should be considered independently. The appellant's entitlement to Cenvat credit for inputs used in manufacturing doors and windows was upheld, despite claiming exemption for construction services. The Tribunal emphasized treating manufacturing and service provisions separately for tax purposes, overturning previous denials of Cenvat credit. en-us Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345271 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the appellant's manufacturing and construction activities should be considered independently. The appellant's entitlement to Cenvat credit for inputs used in manufacturing doors and windows was upheld, despite claiming exemption for construction services. The Tribunal emphasized treating manufacturing and service provisions separately for tax purposes, overturning previous denials of Cenvat credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345271