<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345271</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of aluminium doors and windows was admissible where the goods were cleared on payment of duty, because the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activity had to be examined separately from its construction service activity. The fact that the assessee also claimed abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST for construction services did not justify denial of credit attributable to manufacture. Credit law must be applied activity-wise, and admissible input credit for dutiable manufacture cannot be refused merely due to an exemption or abatement issue in a separate service segment. The denial of credit was unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345271</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of aluminium doors and windows was admissible where the goods were cleared on payment of duty, because the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activity had to be examined separately from its construction service activity. The fact that the assessee also claimed abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST for construction services did not justify denial of credit attributable to manufacture. Credit law must be applied activity-wise, and admissible input credit for dutiable manufacture cannot be refused merely due to an exemption or abatement issue in a separate service segment. The denial of credit was unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>