<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for interest on short payment of duty under Section 11A but set aside the penalty under Section 11AC due to the absence of intent to evade duty. Previous judgments were cited to support the appellant&#039;s argument. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision issued on 26/05/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for interest on short payment of duty under Section 11A but set aside the penalty under Section 11AC due to the absence of intent to evade duty. Previous judgments were cited to support the appellant&#039;s argument. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision issued on 26/05/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>