https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345269 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant. It held that the inadvertent double debiting of Cenvat credit did not constitute duty payment, allowing the Appellant to rectify the error by taking suo moto credit. The Tribunal emphasized that no Section 11B refund process was necessary in this case, citing legal precedents supporting the Appellant's position. The impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal concluded that the Appellant rightly rectified the mistake, ultimately favoring the Appellant's argument. en-us Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:25:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345269 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant. It held that the inadvertent double debiting of Cenvat credit did not constitute duty payment, allowing the Appellant to rectify the error by taking suo moto credit. The Tribunal emphasized that no Section 11B refund process was necessary in this case, citing legal precedents supporting the Appellant's position. The impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal concluded that the Appellant rightly rectified the mistake, ultimately favoring the Appellant's argument. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345269