https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345268 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Commissioner's decision in favor of the 100% EOU. The Tribunal determined that the EOU's activities constituted manufacturing, justifying the levy of duty on the goods cleared for DTA sales. It rejected the Revenue's arguments regarding duty demands, confiscation liabilities, and penalty imposition on the Chairman, ultimately affirming the legality of the EOU's actions and allowing a name change due to amalgamation. en-us Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:25:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345268 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Commissioner's decision in favor of the 100% EOU. The Tribunal determined that the EOU's activities constituted manufacturing, justifying the levy of duty on the goods cleared for DTA sales. It rejected the Revenue's arguments regarding duty demands, confiscation liabilities, and penalty imposition on the Chairman, ultimately affirming the legality of the EOU's actions and allowing a name change due to amalgamation. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345268