https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345263 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to Sales-tax incentives for investments made after 31st December 2005. The court upheld the State's interpretation of the Scheme and found no basis for treating Phase II as a pipeline project or applying promissory estoppel. The petitioners' claims were deemed an afterthought, and the court emphasized the need for consistent application of the Scheme's provisions. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:24:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345263 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to Sales-tax incentives for investments made after 31st December 2005. The court upheld the State's interpretation of the Scheme and found no basis for treating Phase II as a pipeline project or applying promissory estoppel. The petitioners' claims were deemed an afterthought, and the court emphasized the need for consistent application of the Scheme's provisions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345263