https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193072 The Supreme Court determined that the temple and its deity were a private family deity based on documentary and oral evidence. The documents (Ext. A and Ext. 1) highlighted the family's exclusive control and management of the temple, indicating a private endowment. Oral testimonies further supported this conclusion, emphasizing the absence of public worship rights. The Court overturned the High Court's decision, reinstating the trial court's ruling that recognized the endowment as private. The appellants were granted costs of Rs. 4,000. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:09:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193072 The Supreme Court determined that the temple and its deity were a private family deity based on documentary and oral evidence. The documents (Ext. A and Ext. 1) highlighted the family's exclusive control and management of the temple, indicating a private endowment. Oral testimonies further supported this conclusion, emphasizing the absence of public worship rights. The Court overturned the High Court's decision, reinstating the trial court's ruling that recognized the endowment as private. The appellants were granted costs of Rs. 4,000. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193072