<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (7) TMI 77 - High Court Of Madras</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193069</link>
    <description>A dedication under a settlement deed can create a religious endowment connected with a temple where the property is intended for and used as public religious worship. Under the Act, the decisive test is actual dedication and user for worship, not conformity with Agama Sastras or the performance of prana pratishta or kumbhabhisheka. The deed and evidence showed a clear dedication for worship of the nalvar idols, with daily pooja, neivedyam, shodasa upacharams and guru pooja, and the idols were installed and worshipped by the public in the temple premises. On that basis, the endowment fell within the statutory definition and the scheme-making power under Section 64 was attracted; the challenge to the scheme failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (7) TMI 77 - High Court Of Madras</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193069</link>
      <description>A dedication under a settlement deed can create a religious endowment connected with a temple where the property is intended for and used as public religious worship. Under the Act, the decisive test is actual dedication and user for worship, not conformity with Agama Sastras or the performance of prana pratishta or kumbhabhisheka. The deed and evidence showed a clear dedication for worship of the nalvar idols, with daily pooja, neivedyam, shodasa upacharams and guru pooja, and the idols were installed and worshipped by the public in the temple premises. On that basis, the endowment fell within the statutory definition and the scheme-making power under Section 64 was attracted; the challenge to the scheme failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>