<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 354 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 153C and add Rs. 49,50,000 without incriminating material. The Tribunal also found that the assessee adequately explained the cash receipts, leading to the deletion of the addition under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 354 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 153C and add Rs. 49,50,000 without incriminating material. The Tribunal also found that the assessee adequately explained the cash receipts, leading to the deletion of the addition under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>