<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 348 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345236</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the denial of refund on various services, including DG Rent, Telecommunication Services, Manpower Recruitment Agency Services, House Keeping Services, Professional/Management Consultant Services, and Installation, Testing, and Commissioning Services of Bio-metric Attendance System, was rejected. The First Appellate Authority overturned the denial, establishing the legal sustainability of the refund for each service based on detailed reasoning. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision, affirming the appellant&#039;s eligibility for CENVAT Credit and refund of service tax paid on the mentioned services, in line with established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:06:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 348 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345236</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the denial of refund on various services, including DG Rent, Telecommunication Services, Manpower Recruitment Agency Services, House Keeping Services, Professional/Management Consultant Services, and Installation, Testing, and Commissioning Services of Bio-metric Attendance System, was rejected. The First Appellate Authority overturned the denial, establishing the legal sustainability of the refund for each service based on detailed reasoning. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision, affirming the appellant&#039;s eligibility for CENVAT Credit and refund of service tax paid on the mentioned services, in line with established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>