<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 335 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the allowance of cenvat credit on Call Centre Services for sale promotion, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the services were post-sale and not eligible for credit. Additionally, the demand on scrap cleared without duty payment was dismissed due to the Revenue&#039;s prior knowledge of the scrap generation since 2011, with no evidence of tax evasion. The Tribunal affirmed the decisions of the Ld. Commissioner (A) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no error in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:05:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 335 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the allowance of cenvat credit on Call Centre Services for sale promotion, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the services were post-sale and not eligible for credit. Additionally, the demand on scrap cleared without duty payment was dismissed due to the Revenue&#039;s prior knowledge of the scrap generation since 2011, with no evidence of tax evasion. The Tribunal affirmed the decisions of the Ld. Commissioner (A) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no error in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>