<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 311 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345199</link>
    <description>The court held that an unregistered partnership firm can maintain a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Supreme Court clarified that Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act, which bars unregistered firms from civil suits, does not apply to criminal proceedings under Section 138 as they aim at penal liability, not recovery of money. The decisions of Kerala, Karnataka, and Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Courts were upheld, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument against the maintainability of the complaint due to the complainant&#039;s unregistered status. The petition and application were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 311 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345199</link>
      <description>The court held that an unregistered partnership firm can maintain a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Supreme Court clarified that Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act, which bars unregistered firms from civil suits, does not apply to criminal proceedings under Section 138 as they aim at penal liability, not recovery of money. The decisions of Kerala, Karnataka, and Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Courts were upheld, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument against the maintainability of the complaint due to the complainant&#039;s unregistered status. The petition and application were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>