<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1059 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, concerning delay in payment of employee contributions to ESIC and PF. However, the disallowance under section 14A of the Act, based on investments in mutual funds, was sustained, partly allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1059 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, concerning delay in payment of employee contributions to ESIC and PF. However, the disallowance under section 14A of the Act, based on investments in mutual funds, was sustained, partly allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>