<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (5) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9042</link>
    <description>Amounts appropriated for proposed dividends and for tax liability are not reserves for capital computation under rule 1 of Schedule 2 to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, where they are earmarked to meet specific liabilities and are not available for the company&#039;s future use. The sum set apart for proposed dividends therefore could not be included as reserve. For tax provision, only the amount actually required to meet the tax liability is excluded from reserve treatment; any excess over the actual liability may qualify as reserve. As the precise tax liability had not been determined, the tax-provision issue required further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (5) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9042</link>
      <description>Amounts appropriated for proposed dividends and for tax liability are not reserves for capital computation under rule 1 of Schedule 2 to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, where they are earmarked to meet specific liabilities and are not available for the company&#039;s future use. The sum set apart for proposed dividends therefore could not be included as reserve. For tax provision, only the amount actually required to meet the tax liability is excluded from reserve treatment; any excess over the actual liability may qualify as reserve. As the precise tax liability had not been determined, the tax-provision issue required further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>