<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 715 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193057</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remitted back to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) for fresh adjudication with specific directions due to the lack of detailed findings in the DRP&#039;s order regarding transfer pricing objections raised by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for a comprehensive and elaborate order in accordance with legal requirements and procedural standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:09:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 715 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193057</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remitted back to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) for fresh adjudication with specific directions due to the lack of detailed findings in the DRP&#039;s order regarding transfer pricing objections raised by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for a comprehensive and elaborate order in accordance with legal requirements and procedural standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>