https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193049 Seasonal cashewnut factories were held outside the lay-off compensation scheme under Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, because Sections 25A to 25E exclude seasonal establishments; a Tribunal could not award equivalent compensation for closure caused by raw material shortage on general notions of social justice. The claim for payment during the closed period was therefore not maintainable. However, under Section 79 of the Factories Act, earned leave with wages could still be directed where the governing statute contained no corresponding exclusion, so the grant of one day's leave for every twenty days' work was upheld. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:27:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193049 Seasonal cashewnut factories were held outside the lay-off compensation scheme under Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, because Sections 25A to 25E exclude seasonal establishments; a Tribunal could not award equivalent compensation for closure caused by raw material shortage on general notions of social justice. The claim for payment during the closed period was therefore not maintainable. However, under Section 79 of the Factories Act, earned leave with wages could still be directed where the governing statute contained no corresponding exclusion, so the grant of one day's leave for every twenty days' work was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193049