https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193046 Minority educational institutions retain an absolute right to establish and administer institutions of their choice, subject only to reasonable regulations aimed at making them effective educational institutions. Measures that merely interfere with bare management do not, by themselves, infringe property or occupation rights under Article 19(1)(f) or 19(1)(g). By contrast, a reservation of seats for Government-nominated teachers, coupled with threats to withdraw grant or recognition, substantially impairs the right to administer and amounts to an indirect invasion of Article 30(1). The Article 19 challenge failed, while the Article 30(1) challenge succeeded to the extent of invalidating the coercive reservation and related directions. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:58:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193046 Minority educational institutions retain an absolute right to establish and administer institutions of their choice, subject only to reasonable regulations aimed at making them effective educational institutions. Measures that merely interfere with bare management do not, by themselves, infringe property or occupation rights under Article 19(1)(f) or 19(1)(g). By contrast, a reservation of seats for Government-nominated teachers, coupled with threats to withdraw grant or recognition, substantially impairs the right to administer and amounts to an indirect invasion of Article 30(1). The Article 19 challenge failed, while the Article 30(1) challenge succeeded to the extent of invalidating the coercive reservation and related directions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193046