<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 306 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345194</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 81,22,83,000/-. The decision was based on the consistent treatment of upfront expenses and income in the return of income, the accrual of expenses during the year, and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Taparia Tools Ltd vs JCIT. The ITAT found that the assessee&#039;s method of claiming expenses was in line with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, despite the different treatment in the books of accounts due to RBI guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 306 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345194</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 81,22,83,000/-. The decision was based on the consistent treatment of upfront expenses and income in the return of income, the accrual of expenses during the year, and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Taparia Tools Ltd vs JCIT. The ITAT found that the assessee&#039;s method of claiming expenses was in line with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, despite the different treatment in the books of accounts due to RBI guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>